<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Spectacu.la - Free GPL WordPress Themes Club &#187; wordpress themes library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spectacu.la/tag/wordpress-themes-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spectacu.la</link>
	<description>WordPress GPL Themes and Support Forum</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>WordPress.org Pull 200 GPL Themes</title>
		<link>http://spectacu.la/wordpressorg-pull-200-gpl-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://spectacu.la/wordpressorg-pull-200-gpl-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Coveney</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rejection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress themes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress themes library]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spectacu.la/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without any prior announcement, WordPress.Org pulled 200 (well, 199 to be precise) themes from their Theme Library overnight on the 9th/10th of December 2008, suspending them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://spectacu.la/wp-content/uploads/wp-2008-12-02.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-80" title="wp-2008-12-02" src="http://spectacu.la/wp-content/uploads/wp-2008-12-02.png" alt="WordPress.org on the 2nd of December 2008" width="259" height="203" /></a>Without any prior announcement, <a title="WordPress" href="http://wordpress.org">WordPress.Org</a> pulled 200 (well, 201 to be precise) themes from their <a title="WP Theme Library" href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/">Theme Library</a> overnight on the 9th/10th of December 2008, suspending them.</p>
<p>The only information we got was:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>Links to spectacu.la will no longer
be approved, as a result this theme
has been suspended.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>That was it.  A lot of work to get the theme right, to conform to their standards, xhtml standards and every damn browser we could find and they pull it with no more than a one-line automated mailing.  I e-mailed but, as is usually the case with anything to do with Automattic, there was no response.  And of course there&#8217;s nothing on the blog either.  No surprise there then.</p>
<p>Prior to the pulling, 712 themes were available <em>(see image above right)</em>, while now there are just 511 themes available <em>(below right)</em>.</p>
<h3>We&#8217;re Highly Miffed (to be quite English about it)</h3>
<p>At first I was just irritated.  Then I guessed that they&#8217;d decided that a theme couldn&#8217;t link back to any commercial organisation - even if that commercial organisation is producing no-strings GPL code.  I&#8217;m not quite sure why WordPress.org has such an issue with commercialism - <a title="Automattic" href="http://automattic.com/">Automattic</a>, who run WordPress, are a very commercial entity.  The <a title="WordPress raise funding" href="http://gigaom.com/2008/01/22/wordpresscom-creator-raises-29m/">$29.5m of funding</a> behind them is hardly insignificant.  $29.5m is about 29,500,000 times more profit than we&#8217;ve made from Spectacu.la so far.  We don&#8217;t have the luxury of venture capital either, being funded entirely out of our own pockets.</p>
<p>The more I think about it, the more I realise that Automattic appear to want it every way - to have their own protected IP and commercial interests whilst keeping all others as far away as possible.  Anyone, commercial or otherwise, who contributes to a GPL project puts in a huge amount of time and effort on code that they could so easily lose control of and for which there&#8217;s definitely zero direct monetary reward.  With the Evening Sun theme we created we introduced an interesting approach to handling threaded comments that&#8217;s designed to prevent rambling threads, but allow nested conversations regardless.  That code&#8217;s GPL.  Anybody can use it.</p>
<p><a href="http://spectacu.la/wp-content/uploads/wp-2008-12-10.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-81" title="wp-2008-12-10" src="http://spectacu.la/wp-content/uploads/wp-2008-12-10.png" alt="WordPress.org on the 10th of December 2008" width="281" height="196" /></a>And the reward for all the work that went into this?  The work that got it backward compatible, degrading safely if JS wasn&#8217;t available, and didn&#8217;t break in IE6?  Well it seems we can&#8217;t have it.  Or at least, not from WordPress.org anyway, even though that code, perhaps in modified form, could easily find itself all over the place.  All we wanted was a measly link, and we can&#8217;t have it.</p>
<h3>Dangled Carrots</h3>
<p>One of the reasons we created Spectacu.la was because last year <a title="Matt Mullenweg announces a themes marketplace" href="http://ma.tt/2007/11/wpcom-marketplace-idea/">Matt Mullenweg announced the idea of a Themes Marketplace</a>.  This would allow themes developers to earn some money.  Well, 50% of the price of the theme anyway, with the remaining 50% going to Automattic.  But it&#8217;s expensive to set these things up&#8230; if it&#8217;s done commercially.</p>
<p>And we thought that it was a great idea - I dropped Mr Mullenweg a line, and we soon received instructions and a deadline.  We created a brand new theme (Grassland in fact) which was to be an exclusive - we couldn&#8217;t make it available anywhere else - and it had to be GPL so it fit in with WordPress.org for free download and rights.  Fair enough.  Prior to that we&#8217;d always coded for clients, it would be nice to give something back.</p>
<p>Our pricing for Grassland was pretty low, figuring that it wasn&#8217;t <em>that</em> ornate a theme, and didn&#8217;t have any special functionality.  I think we were aiming at around $20 per theme.</p>
<p>Soon enough we got confirmation that we would be launch partners for this club.  Yay!  Our code is good, and we made required modifications to fit in to Automattic&#8217;s standards.</p>
<p>Then it went silent.  A month passed.  I e-mailed.  And nothing.  A lot of prodding later and we were told there were delays.  These things happen and we had other things to do, so we waited some more.  Eventually in summer I contacted Lloyd Budd who was in charge of this element of the project, and&#8230; nothing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem.  It took two weeks to develop Grassland to the standards to which we and Automattic work.  We&#8217;re quicker these days, but even so&#8230; that&#8217;s quite a bit of work for someone to do for exactly $0.  And at that time the company as a whole was losing a lot of money.  We really needed some funds, and they never came.  Not even a few quid.  A theme download a week would have covered our broadband bills, for example.  We weren&#8217;t in financial trouble, but these are difficult times for a new company without venture capital.  But in the end forming Spectacu.la as a way to help raise some revenue from our intelectual property made clear sense.</p>
<h3>Lack of Openness at Automattic?  Arrogance?</h3>
<p>Yep - just doesn&#8217;t feel like a very open company.  You&#8217;ll struggle to find their address on their website (I couldn&#8217;t)  and they rarely give clear guidelines about what they do and do not accept in their own repositories.  Their arrogance comes from success, I suppose.  They must be busy people and have little time to worry about the concerns of us little folk.  And when something is changed&#8230; it just happens.  Theme and plugin developers are expected to respond quickly and positively, but obviously for no additional reward&#8230; it almost feels like the only ones they like to be rewarded for their hard work are those at&#8230; Automattic.</p>
<h3>Start Showing Some Grace</h3>
<p>We&#8217;ve provided other resources back to the community - our <a title="WordPress 2.6 User Manual" href="http://spectacu.la/wordpress-26-user-guide/">WP User Manual</a> is free in PDF form, and I do my best to keep it up to date, in spite of the lack of financial reward.</p>
<p>So Spectacu.la and the people behind it put a huge amount of effort into the WP community and our reward for deciding to contribute a professional quality GPL theme with zero strings attached was a one line automated e-mail.</p>
<p>If Automattic continues to treat WordPress developers with such disdain, they can expect to start losing the support of the community.  They need to start treating us all a little better and not expecting that we can all make a decent, passable living from giving our stuff away.  This is even more important now there&#8217;s a worldwide recession - money simply isn&#8217;t easy to find any longer and debts are no longer tolerated so well by our bankers.  It&#8217;s down to brass tacks - we need to survive, and we need to find ways to get paid for what we do.  A bit of publicity from our not insignificant free stuff helps with that.</p>
<p><em>Linkage:  Received a great link from a webapart to a Gaping Void cartoon.  Is this what WordPress are trying to achieve?  <a title="Walled Gardens" href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/003360.html">http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/003360.html</a></em></p>
<blockquote><p>Update - Matt Mullenweg has been in touch to say that mistakes may have been made.  It&#8217;s not clear how this tallies with the change in policy saying that themes link to sites that support premium themes aren&#8217;t allowed&#8230; however he does say that if we&#8217;re kosher with the GPL and the policy on our site doesn&#8217;t attempt to change that (and we always aim to be 100% straight, legal and fair) then it was most likely a mistake.  So in our case we <em>believe</em> that we should start seeing our themes on the repository again soon.  Good, because we&#8217;ve got a tasty re-jig of Grassland (called Grassland 2.0 funny enough) which has full WP2.7 loveliness <img src='http://spectacu.la/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I need to also add that we&#8217;ve been told it&#8217;s bad form to conflate Automattic with WordPress.org - although they&#8217;re highly interlinked they should be considered separately.  However, given they&#8217;re both led by the same person, it&#8217;s natural that one will influence the other.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spectacu.la/wordpressorg-pull-200-gpl-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
